[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 2/2] nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host: Fix inclusion of elftosb and mxsldr

[Otavio Salvador]

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Eric Bénard <eric at eukrea.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please keep the ML in copy.

Ouch, forgot by mistake.

> Le Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:12:08 -0200,
> Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br> a écrit :
>
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Eric Bénard <eric at eukrea.com> wrote:
>> > Le Thu, 17 Jan 2013 08:29:04 -0200,
>> > Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br> a écrit :
>> >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Eric Bénard <eric at eukrea.com> wrote:
>> >> > Le Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:02:29 -0200,
>> >> > Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br> a écrit :
>> >> >> > Shouldn't we limit this to the machines which need these tools ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> How do you think we can manage this?
>> >> >>
>> >> > maybe using mxs override in the bbappend ?
>> >>
>> >> Or maybe armv5? since this is useful for toolchains for all mxs SoCs?
>> >>
>> > no, i.MX25 is armv5 and doesn't use these tools.
>> > And other BSP can provide support for armv5 machines which also don't
>> > need these tools.
>>
>> So in this case use 'mxs' would do it. The problem with this is the
>> package group is a native so it is suppose to be regarding host but we
>> seems to be changing it content of the host depending on the target.
>>
> What is the problem ?
> The SDK are already typed with parameters of the target (headers of the
> target's kernel, compiler's target arch, dev libraries included in sync
> with the content of target's image, etc ...).

Ok; I will check it and send a patch...

--
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br