[meta-freescale] mesa-dri vs amd-gpu-x11-bin-mx51

[Otavio Salvador]

On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Eric Bénard <eric at eukrea.com> wrote:
> Le Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:54:13 +0200,
> Andrei Gherzan <andrei at gherzan.ro> a écrit :
>
>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br>wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Eric Bénard <eric at eukrea.com> wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > has anyone here already seen this messages ?
>> >
>> > Yes; I started checking it but I still do not have an absolute answer
>> > to how to fix it.
>> >
>> > The problem is xserver-xorg (when it has glx enabled) it depends on
>> > mesa-dri. Both mesa-dri and GPU package libraries (the mx5 and mx6
>> > ones) provide same (theorical) functionality of mesa-dri, libraries
>> > and (most) headers leading to those errors.
>> >
>> > I did check how Xorg is compiled in LTIB and it doesn't has glx
>> > enabled so my idea is to disable glx in Xorg and try to go this route.
>> > This would allow for a clean build at cost of making xserver-xorg
>> > machine specific. Do you have any other idea?
>> >
>>
>> Why do you need glx after all? We don't have opengl for imx53 right?
>> And about the fix. Xorg with glx should  depend on virtual/libgl (or gl)
>> not mesa-dri.
>>
> mesa-dri provides virtual/libgl which can explain why we find it here.

In fact mesa provides all them (GL ES2 and GL ES1 too).

--
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br