[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][for-danny][PATCH] fsl-mm-flv-codeclib: fix package creation

[Daiane Angolini]

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Javier Viguera <javier.viguera at digi.com> wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 11:25 AM, Daiane Angolini wrote:
>> Could you, please, apply it to master in order to make sure it's
>> applicable? I will test it on master.
>>
>> How do you test this package?
>
> Hi Daiane,
>
> Yes the patch applies to master as well without problems.
>
> About the testing. I have not tested it at run time yet. We plan to
> use it with gst-fsl plugin. At build time the package is not compiled
> because it's not a dependence of anything (for a 'imx53qsb' configured
> project). But you can build the recipe with bitbake:
>
> $ bitbake fsl-mm-flv-codeclib
>
> You can see then, that the normal package is not created (it only
> creates the -dev and -dbg packages):
>
> $ ls -l tmp/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-poky-linux-gnueabi/fsl-mm-flv-codeclib-2.0.3-r1/deploy-ipks/armv7a-vfp-neon/
>    792 Jan  8 12:15 fsl-mm-flv-codeclib-dbg_2.0.3-r1_armv7a-vfp-neon.ipk
>  54578 Jan  8 12:15 fsl-mm-flv-codeclib-dev_2.0.3-r1_armv7a-vfp-neon.ipk
>
> Looking at the log we see the reason. There are no files to be added
> to the package and that's why it's not created.
>
> $ less tmp/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-poky-linux-gnueabi/fsl-mm-flv-codeclib-2.0.3-r1/temp/log.do_package_write_ipk
> ...
> NOTE: Not creating empty archive for fsl-mm-flv-codeclib-2.0.3-r1
> ...
>
> And there are no files because the name of the library files in the
> source package does not follow the naming rule the bitbake recipe
> expects in the 'do_install' function and in the FILES variable.
Great, thanks a lot!

I will include this package on some image, and I will test it runtime as well.

In case you test it runtime, please, let me know the results.


Daiane