[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm-extra][PATCH] UDOO board machine

[Otavio Salvador]

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:00 PM, John Weber <rjohnweber at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Luca -
>
> I'm not sure if the policy has changed, but I think you'll need to send
> separate patches series for the machine, U-boot, and the kernel, rather than
> bundling them all up in one large patch.  These should be maintained
> separately.
>
> A couple of other things:
> - Normally, the defconfig needs to be saved using make savedefconfig from
> the kernel Kbuild system.  This significantly reduces the size of the
> defconfig file and makes for easier comparison/control later on.
> - Since you are maintaining a separate kernel repository on Github, why not
> consider incorporating some of these patches into the kernel instead of
> maintaining them separately in the recipe?  The ARM GCC patches (ARM 7670
> and the memset fix) are examples.

Your remarks are correct; by the way, use linux-udoo and u-boot-udoo
recipes as 'unico' is too generic.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750