[meta-freescale] GPU tests on master next - core-image-x11 - sfp

[Daiane Angolini]

On 08/28/2013 03:00 PM, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Le Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:20:25 -0300,
> Daiane Angolini <daiane.angolini at freescale.com> a écrit :
>
>> On 08/28/2013 01:43 PM, Daiane Angolini wrote:
>>> I've been running some tests on master-next.
>>>
>>> I used the following commands. Do you know any other I could run?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The past email, was for SOFT fp
>>> RESULTS:
>>> $ DISPLAY=:0 glxgears
>>> 108 frames in 5.0 seconds = 21.508 FPS
>>>
>>> $ DISPLAY=:0 es2gears_x11
>>> 1494 frames in 5.0 seconds = 298.740 FPS
>>>
>>> $ DISPLAY=:0 glmark2-es2
>>> glmark2 Score: 212
>>>
>>> $ DISPLAY=:0 glmark2-es2 --fullscreen
>>> glmark2 Score: 229
>>
>> The results for HARD fp:
>>
>>
>> $ DISPLAY=:0 glxgears
>> 107 frames in 5.0 seconds = 21.395 FPS
>>
>> $ DISPLAY=:0 es2gears_x11
>> 1451 frames in 5.0 seconds = 290.200 FPS
>>
>> $ DISPLAY=:0 glmark2-es2
>> glmark2 Score: 213
>>
>> $ DISPLAY=:0 glmark2-es2 --fullscreen
>> glmark2 Score: 228
>>
> so hardfp brings lower results than softfp ... interesting ;-)

I took only measure. One time. I haven't calculated the standard 
deviation or error from measures.

I would say the results is just "equal".

And, I'm not sure how much hfp and sfp impacts the result of a task 
executed mainly by hardware (gpu).


Do you think, by the results, that there is still any bug?


>
> Eric
>


-- 
Daiane