[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH] xf86-dri-vivante: add missing dependency on xf86driproto

[Christian Charreyre]

Le 22/04/2013 15:51, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Christian Charreyre
> <christian.charreyre at cioinfoindus.fr> wrote:
>> Le 19/04/2013 20:04, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Otavio Salvador
>>> <otavio at ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Christian Charreyre
>>>> <christian.charreyre at cioinfoindus.fr> wrote:
>>>>> Without this dependency recipe failed to compile (triggered by bitbake
>>>>> core-image-x11)
>>>> First, thanks for the patch. This explanation would be good to have in
>>>> the commit log or something generic if you prefer.
>> Sorry for the bad format, it's my first send, and I didn't find an
>> explanation on the good practices for patch submission. Is there one
>> anywhere ?
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Contribution_Guidelines#Patch_Headers_and_Commit_Messages
>
> But the change does seem not required. I did a full build without it
> and had no issues.
Thanks for the pointer. I do understand that this patch was not necessary.
>
>>> I did a full build from scratch of xf86-dri-vivante (no tmp, no
>>> sstate-cache) and it did work so I think you had other failure.
>> With the patch I succedeed to build xf86-dri-vivante, but I have another
>> problem when building complete image (do_rootfs).
>> After more investigation, it seems that the problem is in DISTRO_FEATURES.
>> As I have not specified DISTRO_FEATURES in my local.conf, and uses the very
>> neutral one from openembedded-core, I do not have glx in my distro features.
>> I will try to add x11 and glx in DISTRO_FEATURES, and report then what
>> happens.
> I've been building using Poky, not OE-Core. If you find out how to
> reproduce the issue let me know and I can check it as well.
Question : do you work with a yocto base, or do you use a poky config on an
openembedded-core base ?

I've first tried generating meta-fsl-arm over yocto (danny), but I got 
errors
(versionning problem between components I guess), so I read the README
of the layer  meta-fsl-arm, and it tells that it depends only on :

openembedded-core
branch master
revision HEAD,

not yocto, so this is the reason why I swapped to OE-core, but I think 
OE-core
is too distribution agnostic for core-x11-image.


>
> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
>
>


-- 

Christian Charreyre
CIO Informatique Industrielle
11 Avenue Marigny 13014 Marseille
Tél : 04 95 05 19 41
http://www.cioinfoindus.fr