[meta-freescale] Shouldn't we update imx_3.0.35_1.1.0?

Rogerio Nunes ronunes at gmail.com
Mon Apr 22 07:25:29 PDT 2013


Thank you.


On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Rogerio,
>
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Rogerio Nunes <ronunes at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just realized branch imx_3.0.35_1.1.0 is two commits ahead in
> > git.freescale.com, including important LDO ramp up fix.
> >
> > This patch actually updates kernel to release 1.1.1 and besides these two
> > commits, there are two other patches available at freescale.com(1.1.2-PFD
> > and 1.1.3-TEMP) that would be important to include as well in release 1.4
> > IMO.
> >
> > Just want to make sure: any reason for not updating the recipe at his
> point
> > in time?
>
> I have just sent a patch to update 1.1.0.
>
> Regards,
>
> Fabio Estevam
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/attachments/20130422/362689be/attachment.html>


More information about the meta-freescale mailing list