[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm PATCH 2/6] linux-fslc: Update to patches-3.8's snapshot from 20130420

[Daiane Angolini]

On 04/22/2013 09:01 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Daiane Angolini
> <daiane.angolini at freescale.com> wrote:
>> On 04/22/2013 08:43 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>
>>> This features the following updates:
>>>
>>>    * Merge of 3.8.8 stable release
>>>    * Fix for i.MX233 OlinuXino MMC boot
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br>
>>> ---
>>>    recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb | 4 ++--
>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb
>>> b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb
>>> index 68fa8e1..de39564 100644
>>> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb
>>> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb
>>> @@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
>>>    include linux-fslc.inc
>>>
>>>    PV = "3.8+git${SRCPV}"
>>> -PR = "r5"
>>> +PR = "r6"
>>
>>
>> Why some recipes you bump PR and some other you do not?
>
> Auto pilot! :-) This PR bump can be removed.
>
>>>    # patches-3.8
>>> -SRCREV = "9674b8d96fca62bc47be48fd857591dcfca874b1"
>>> +SRCREV = "7fd77a4db4dc59f98a7118fdbbf02d82b03de1de"
>>>
>>>    COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(mxs|mx3|mx5|mx6)"
>>
>>
>> Will you keep "mxs" as compatible machine? (instead of mx28 and mx23, I
>> mean)
>
> This works for both so 'mxs' is the shortest variation of it. I see no
> reason to replace 'mxs' to 'mx23:mx28' when the support is for both
> SoCs.
>
> What do you think?

I completely agree.

My intend was to make it clean and explicit for everyone.

-- 
Daiane