[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm PATCH 2/6] linux-fslc: Update to patches-3.8's snapshot from 20130420

[Otavio Salvador]

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Daiane Angolini
<daiane.angolini at freescale.com> wrote:
> On 04/22/2013 08:43 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>
>> This features the following updates:
>>
>>   * Merge of 3.8.8 stable release
>>   * Fix for i.MX233 OlinuXino MMC boot
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br>
>> ---
>>   recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb
>> b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb
>> index 68fa8e1..de39564 100644
>> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb
>> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb
>> @@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
>>   include linux-fslc.inc
>>
>>   PV = "3.8+git${SRCPV}"
>> -PR = "r5"
>> +PR = "r6"
>
>
> Why some recipes you bump PR and some other you do not?

Auto pilot! :-) This PR bump can be removed.

>>   # patches-3.8
>> -SRCREV = "9674b8d96fca62bc47be48fd857591dcfca874b1"
>> +SRCREV = "7fd77a4db4dc59f98a7118fdbbf02d82b03de1de"
>>
>>   COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(mxs|mx3|mx5|mx6)"
>
>
> Will you keep "mxs" as compatible machine? (instead of mx28 and mx23, I
> mean)

This works for both so 'mxs' is the shortest variation of it. I see no
reason to replace 'mxs' to 'mx23:mx28' when the support is for both
SoCs.

What do you think?

--
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br