[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm PATCH v2 3/3] linux-fslc: Refactor to use linux-imx.inc and avoid duplication of code

[Daiane Angolini]

On 04/18/2013 04:58 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Daiane Angolini
> <daiane.angolini at freescale.com> wrote:
>> On 04/18/2013 03:59 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>
>>> Provides a new linux-fslc.inc file which abstracts the specific
>>> changes for the linux-fslc based kernels. A new variable has been add
>>> to linux-imx.inc to allow to skip the 'imx-test' specific hacks after
>>> kernel install as 'imx-test' is not supported for Linux mainline.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br>
>>> ---
>>
>> I understand what you did, but it's not yet a common place for both kernel
>> recipes.
>>
>> If it is needed for *any* kernel, poky is wrong in not providing this for
>> *any* kernel.
>
> Usually kernel would do the right thing but not in our case. Some
> entry point are even not in the kernel code from FSL branch.

I would accept this argument if we only faced this problem with FSL kernel.

But, as we faced exactly the same with kernel mainline, I can't accept that.

If kernel mainline is wrong, we must fix it.

Daiane