[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm PATCH v2 3/3] linux-fslc: Refactor to use linux-imx.inc and avoid duplication of code

Fabio Estevam festevam at gmail.com
Thu Apr 18 16:46:48 PDT 2013


On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Otavio Salvador
<otavio at ossystems.com.br> wrote:

> Usually kernel would do the right thing but not in our case. Some

I don't understand. Why 'usually'? In what sense is our case different?

> entry point are even not in the kernel code from FSL branch.

What does it mean?

>
>> If poky is right, we are setting this in the wrong way.
>
> Both seems right. Poky is doing the general assumption, we're doing
> what we need specific for the support of the kernels.

I agree with Daiane here. I am OK with your patch, but I also see it
as workaround.



More information about the meta-freescale mailing list