[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 2/3] xf86-video-imxfb-vivante: Fix build with new Vivante GPU packaging

Fabio Estevam festevam at gmail.com
Thu Apr 4 14:54:58 PDT 2013


On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br> wrote:

> Yes; I think it makes sense but not usually done in Yocto as bisect is
> not expected to be fully working in Yocto repositories so I am not
> sure about how to handle it. I see pros and cons for both approaches.
> What your point of view?

In the projects I participate it is not allowed to introduce a commit
that builds the breakage, even if it will be fixed in the subsequent
commit and I agree that this is a good practice.

Or at least your commit could be like:

"Since commit xxxxx (gpu-viv-bin-mx6q: Rework package for a single
backend use ) the backend suffix from libraries
was removed, so remove the LDFLAGS to fix the build"

Anyway, I prefer not to break things at the first place.



More information about the meta-freescale mailing list