[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm] [meta-ivi] layer stable branch request

Sarbu, Florin-Ionut (Florin) Florin.Sarbu at windriver.com
Thu Nov 29 11:07:05 PST 2012

Hi Adrian,
as far as meta-ivi is concerned, you can use the 3.0 branch that is designed to work with poky (oe-core) danny branch.
Looking forward to receiving further contributions from your team.

Thank you,

-----Original Message-----
From: Alonso Lazcano Adrian-B38018 [B38018 at freescale.com<mailto:B38018 at freescale.com>]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:06 AM Pacific Standard Time
To: Sarbu, Florin-Ionut (Florin); Behrens, Holger; meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
Cc: Li Yi i.MX-R80015; Dunham Ragan-B37558; Gherzan, Andrei; Otavio Salvador; Angolini Daiane-B19406
Subject: [meta-fsl-arm] [meta-ivi] layer stable branch request

Hi Florin, Andrei

We had been using  meta-ivi layer to generate Genivi compliance BSP for demo purposes,
and we want to use meta-ivi + meta-fsl-arm to create a more formal BSP that we can deliver to
our clients.

We want to relay on “meta-ivi” but we require a stable branch where we base our work and guarantee,
that our clients could also be able to build by them self a working BSP.

In meta-fsl-arm layer we are about to move our master branch to a new branch that will target oe-core “danny”
branch, so we could base our future work on a stable branch, and use the same branch on all layers.


In the processes as we encounter bugs/issues in any layer we are more that welling to provide fixes for “stable” and
next release branch (master).

@Florian, Holger, what do you think.

Adrian Alonso
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/attachments/20121129/8aa11523/attachment.html>

More information about the meta-freescale mailing list