[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc denzil] cryptodev kernel module recipe

McClintock Matthew-B29882 B29882 at freescale.com
Wed Nov 28 11:33:00 PST 2012

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Otavio Salvador
<otavio at ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:00 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882
> <B29882 at freescale.com> wrote:
>>>> You made the same mistake reveiwing this Darren did... these are NOT
>>>> in our recipe they are in the projects Makefile that we don't control.
>>>> We are just patching up the Makefile a bit so it works properly and
>>>> don't want to redefine variables this project has been using.
>>>> OTOH this patch needs an upstream-status and also needs to be sent upstream.
>>> Yes I know it is inside of the project Makefile however you're
>>> patching it anyway so better to make it us the standards and send
>>> upstream.
>> That's fine, but I would not let that hold up this patch if the author
>> did not want to pursue getting upstream to change such things. ;)
> This recipe is not target to meta-fsl-ppc, is it? It seems to fit
> meta-openembedded.

Well, the maintainer there would have the final say, but I think
changing an upstream projects stuff should not effect it's acceptance
(into meta-oe or meta-fsl-ppc)


More information about the meta-freescale mailing list