[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH] Added support for i.MX6 series Nitrogen6w board Signed-off-by: Pushpalatha <pushpalatha.sg at mistralsolutions.com>
daiane.list at gmail.com
Mon Dec 17 04:53:57 PST 2012
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Pushpalatha
<pushpalatha.sg at mistralsolutions.com> wrote:
> conf/machine/imx6qnitrogen6w.conf | 18 +
> .../support_nitrogen6x_config.patch | 27324 +++++++++++++++++++
> recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fslc_2012.10.bb | 2 +
> .../linux-imx-3.0.35/imx6qnitrogen6w/defconfig | 3020 ++
> .../support_for_nitrogen6_configuration.patch | 11469 ++++++++
> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx_3.0.35.bb | 3 +
> 6 files changed, 41836 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 conf/machine/imx6qnitrogen6w.conf
This board should be included on meta-fsl-arm-extra. Could you,
please, rebase your patches for that project?
> create mode 100644 recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fslc-v2012.10/imx6qnitrogen6w/support_nitrogen6x_config.patch
Please, take a look https://github.com/Freescale/u-boot-imx
This is where we get u-boot from. It´s a fork of mainline one (denx)
plus some patches to include some patches that will be included on
next u-boot version or some patches to configure something rellated
with yocto (for example, scripts for inicialization).
I think it´s better to include your board (nitrogen6w) patches on that
repository instead for supporting those patches on the recipe.
But, the main question here is: Does u-boot mainline support
What´s the difference between nitrogen6x and nitrogen6w? May this
board use nitrogen6x support someway?
Otavio, could you, please, comment on this? I think it would only a
matter of MACHINE_FEATURE.
> create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-3.0.35/imx6qnitrogen6w/defconfig
> create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-3.0.35/imx6qnitrogen6w/support_for_nitrogen6_configuration.patch
The same is applicable to kernel. Apply patches in git repository and
then update kernel recipe.
More information about the meta-freescale