[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 1/3] u-boot: Rename recipe to u-boot-fsl

[Otavio Salvador]

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Andrei Gherzan <andrei at gherzan.ro> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2012 6:53 PM, "Otavio Salvador" <otavio at ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Daiane Angolini
>> <daiane.angolini at freescale.com> wrote:
>> > On 12/14/2012 01:33 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> IMHO renaming the recipe is not the right way to do.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> The only two recipes which are in this set are:
>> >>
>> >>   u-boot
>> >>   linux-mainline
>> >>
>> >> So my proposal is to use:
>> >>
>> >>   u-boot-fslc
>> >>   linux-fslc
>> >>
>> >> What are people thoughts about it?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I see that we have 2 options.
>> >
>> > One of then is the "most right" one - keep the name as is and teach
>> > everyone
>> > how to add a bbappend, and PREFERED_PROVIDER and DEFAULT_PREFERENCE for
>> > every single guy caming here because he has a u-boot recipe in their
>> > recipe.
>> >
>> > In the other hand, we may rename our u-boot recipe to
>> > u-boot-somethingelse.
>> > This way, we have to face less support, and no need to teach anyone how
>> > to
>> > fix their layer.
>> >
>> > How I'm lazy, I would choose the renaming option.
>> >
>> > If I'm wrong on any point, please let me know. I'm not sure I completely
>> > understand the issue here, so I may be simplistic in my interpretation.
>>
>> I simpatize your interpretation and this is my point of view as well.
>>
>
> Otavio can you just add a "c" to "fsl" or need a v2?

Please send a v2 with this. This would be easier for me.

--
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br