[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 1/3] u-boot: Rename recipe to u-boot-fsl

[Andrei Gherzan]

On Dec 14, 2012 6:53 PM, "Otavio Salvador" <otavio at ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Daiane Angolini
> <daiane.angolini at freescale.com> wrote:
> > On 12/14/2012 01:33 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >>>
> >>> IMHO renaming the recipe is not the right way to do.
> >>
> >>
> >> The only two recipes which are in this set are:
> >>
> >>   u-boot
> >>   linux-mainline
> >>
> >> So my proposal is to use:
> >>
> >>   u-boot-fslc
> >>   linux-fslc
> >>
> >> What are people thoughts about it?
> >
> >
> >
> > I see that we have 2 options.
> >
> > One of then is the "most right" one - keep the name as is and teach
everyone
> > how to add a bbappend, and PREFERED_PROVIDER and DEFAULT_PREFERENCE for
> > every single guy caming here because he has a u-boot recipe in their
recipe.
> >
> > In the other hand, we may rename our u-boot recipe to
u-boot-somethingelse.
> > This way, we have to face less support, and no need to teach anyone how
to
> > fix their layer.
> >
> > How I'm lazy, I would choose the renaming option.
> >
> > If I'm wrong on any point, please let me know. I'm not sure I completely
> > understand the issue here, so I may be simplistic in my interpretation.
>
> I simpatize your interpretation and this is my point of view as well.
>

Otavio can you just add a "c" to "fsl" or need a v2?

Ag
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/attachments/20121214/eb8059b2/attachment.html>