[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 1/3] u-boot: Rename recipe to u-boot-fsl

Otavio Salvador otavio at ossystems.com.br
Fri Dec 14 08:53:12 PST 2012

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Daiane Angolini
<daiane.angolini at freescale.com> wrote:
> On 12/14/2012 01:33 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>> IMHO renaming the recipe is not the right way to do.
>> The only two recipes which are in this set are:
>>   u-boot
>>   linux-mainline
>> So my proposal is to use:
>>   u-boot-fslc
>>   linux-fslc
>> What are people thoughts about it?
> I see that we have 2 options.
> One of then is the "most right" one - keep the name as is and teach everyone
> how to add a bbappend, and PREFERED_PROVIDER and DEFAULT_PREFERENCE for
> every single guy caming here because he has a u-boot recipe in their recipe.
> In the other hand, we may rename our u-boot recipe to u-boot-somethingelse.
> This way, we have to face less support, and no need to teach anyone how to
> fix their layer.
> How I'm lazy, I would choose the renaming option.
> If I'm wrong on any point, please let me know. I'm not sure I completely
> understand the issue here, so I may be simplistic in my interpretation.

I simpatize your interpretation and this is my point of view as well.

Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br

More information about the meta-freescale mailing list