[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 1/3] u-boot: Rename recipe to u-boot-fsl
Otavio Salvador
otavio at ossystems.com.br
Fri Dec 14 08:53:12 PST 2012
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Daiane Angolini
<daiane.angolini at freescale.com> wrote:
> On 12/14/2012 01:33 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>
>>> IMHO renaming the recipe is not the right way to do.
>>
>>
>> The only two recipes which are in this set are:
>>
>> u-boot
>> linux-mainline
>>
>> So my proposal is to use:
>>
>> u-boot-fslc
>> linux-fslc
>>
>> What are people thoughts about it?
>
>
>
> I see that we have 2 options.
>
> One of then is the "most right" one - keep the name as is and teach everyone
> how to add a bbappend, and PREFERED_PROVIDER and DEFAULT_PREFERENCE for
> every single guy caming here because he has a u-boot recipe in their recipe.
>
> In the other hand, we may rename our u-boot recipe to u-boot-somethingelse.
> This way, we have to face less support, and no need to teach anyone how to
> fix their layer.
>
> How I'm lazy, I would choose the renaming option.
>
> If I'm wrong on any point, please let me know. I'm not sure I completely
> understand the issue here, so I may be simplistic in my interpretation.
I simpatize your interpretation and this is my point of view as well.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
More information about the meta-freescale
mailing list