[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 1/3] u-boot: Rename recipe to u-boot-fsl

Daiane Angolini daiane.angolini at freescale.com
Fri Dec 14 08:50:07 PST 2012

On 12/14/2012 01:33 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> IMHO renaming the recipe is not the right way to do.
> The only two recipes which are in this set are:
>   u-boot
>   linux-mainline
> So my proposal is to use:
>   u-boot-fslc
>   linux-fslc
> What are people thoughts about it?

I see that we have 2 options.

One of then is the "most right" one - keep the name as is and teach 
everyone how to add a bbappend, and PREFERED_PROVIDER and 
DEFAULT_PREFERENCE for every single guy caming here because he has a 
u-boot recipe in their recipe.

In the other hand, we may rename our u-boot recipe to 
u-boot-somethingelse. This way, we have to face less support, and no 
need to teach anyone how to fix their layer.

How I'm lazy, I would choose the renaming option.

If I'm wrong on any point, please let me know. I'm not sure I completely 
understand the issue here, so I may be simplistic in my interpretation.



More information about the meta-freescale mailing list