[linux-yocto] [PATCH 5/5] mei.cfg: configure Intel MEI driver as module
Kamble, Nitin A
nitin.a.kamble at intel.com
Fri May 16 09:25:02 PDT 2014
On 5/16/2014 6:58 AM, Ong, Boon Leong wrote:
>>> --- a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/amt/mei/mei.cfg
>>> +++ b/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/amt/mei/mei.cfg
>>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>>> CONFIG_STAGING=y
>>> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_CORE=y
>>> CONFIG_INTEL_MEI=y
>> The CONFIG_INTEL_MEI also need to be converted to module.
>>
> I realize that there is no CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_TXE which is meant for BayTrail.
> mei.scc is added in meta-intel/common/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend with comment for
> NUC & valleyisland. So, I think this is a miss for Baytrail case.
>
> Ya, agree that we should make all of the following configs as module.
> CONFIG_INTEL_MEI=m
> CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_ME=m
> CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_TXE=m
>
> I am curious why "etc/modprobe.d/blacklist" is needed if these are kernel module and the user
> should have the wisdom to know whether its Romley platform has the correct ME firmware or not.
> Adding the blacklist will reject any Romley platform with correct ME firmware to load the kernel
> altogether.
> +
It does not make sense to enable a feature for a broken
hardware/firmware. If you really want to support the MEI feature for
Romley BSP, then the firmware issue need to be fixed first. If that is
not possible then, either the BSP is kept as it is, adding a note in the
release note that on the broken firmware the reboot may not work. What
is EOA for a working firmware for Romley? As this is an IOTG BSP, you
guys need to decide how to handle this case here.
Nitin
More information about the linux-yocto
mailing list