[linux-yocto] [PATCH v2 0/4] Cleanup eg20t, 8250, add intel-common BSPs

[Bruce Ashfield]

On 14-02-11 01:01 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
> On 2/10/14, 21:45, "Bruce Ashfield" <bruce.ashfield at windriver.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/11/2014, 12:24 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>> On 2/10/14, 21:23, "Bruce Ashfield" <bruce.ashfield at windriver.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/10/2014, 11:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>>>> On 2/10/14, 16:21, "Bruce Ashfield" <bruce.ashfield at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart at linux.intel.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/6/14, 17:18, "Darren Hart" <dvhart at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This series does some fragment cleanup and adds the two new common
>>>>>>>> BSPs
>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>> meta-intel layer: intel-core2-32 and intel-corei7-64. These BSPs
>>>>>>>> currently
>>>>>>>> include all the corresponding ARCH (32 or 64) BSP descriptions as
>>>>>>>> well
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> common-pc to build two kernels capable of supporting all these
>>>>>>>> machines.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> v2:
>>>>>>>> - Generic to specific ordering in scc files
>>>>>>>> - Use driver fragments from common-pc*, not the entire scc
>>>>>>>> - Update both machines to use CONFIG_MCORE2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Bruce, any pending concerns on this series?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope. I just didn't want to merge it yet, since I have three other
>>>>>> pending updates
>>>>>> to the 3.10 kernel that I was waiting on in the meantime. LTSI being
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> biggest that I want to see merged before piling more on top.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is for -dev first and can go into 3.10 after the LTSI update.
>>>>> Could
>>>>> it go into -dev now? I've got some meta-intel stuff that's queued up
>>>>> behind this and people clawing at me for it :-)
>>>>
>>>> Ack'd. I can do that, I like to keep them in sync, but I'm willing to
>>>> bend that rule to keep things moving. I'll have this merged during
>>>> the day tomorrow.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you kindly.
>>
>> On that same note, I went ahead and merged this to -dev, it is now in
>> the linux-yocto-dev repository.
>>
>> I had a reject for 3.10 on the first patch of the series (we've already
>> done some eg20t work). It wasn't hard to resolve, but can you confirm
>> that you do want this on 3.10 as well as -dev, before I got ahead and
>> push that change.
>>
>> Bruce
>
> As you have expressed an interest in keeping them in sync, please resolve
> the conflict with minnow.scc by adding the eg20t include line. This won't
> hurt anything as any differences between eg20t.cfg and minnow.cfg will
> defer to minnow.cfg as it comes later.

3.10 is still a bit different from the master (-dev) kernel, but I did
a few fixups and it looks sane (enough). Incremental patches to what
I just pushed to 3.10's meta branch are welcomed to fix anything I
did wrong.

Bruce

>
> As I update minnow, we can remove the redundancy later.
>
> --
> Darren
>
>