[linux-yocto] v3.8 kernel recipes in meta-intel

Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfield at windriver.com
Tue Mar 5 09:19:55 PST 2013


On 13-03-05 12:13 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield at windriver.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 9:05 AM
>> To: Kamble, Nitin A
>> Cc: linux-yocto at yoctoproject.org
>> Subject: Re: v3.8 kernel recipes in meta-intel
>>
>> On 13-03-05 12:00 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield at windriver.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 8:41 AM
>>>> To: Kamble, Nitin A
>>>> Cc: linux-yocto at yoctoproject.org
>>>> Subject: Re: v3.8 kernel recipes in meta-intel
>>>>
>>>> On 13-03-05 11:39 AM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield at windriver.com]
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 8:37 AM
>>>>>> To: Kamble, Nitin A
>>>>>> Cc: linux-yocto at yoctoproject.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: v3.8 kernel recipes in meta-intel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 13-03-05 11:33 AM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Bruce,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       I am seeing some unexpected behavior of the v3.8 kernel bits.
>>>>>>> Here is what I am trying to do.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Something is up with your linux-yocto clone:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi  Bruce,
>>>>>       This is not with the local repo. As you can see the SRC_URI it
>>>>> is pointing to the Upstream repo.
>>>>
>>>> By local, I meant the repository the fetcher creates. That commit ID
>>>> is valid in the upstream repository, so there's nothing I can say
>>>> about why it isn't in the clone that is presented for building.
>>>>
>>>> Bruce
>>>
>>> Bruce,
>>>     I tried doing "bitbake cleanall " for the linux-yocto recipe. And it removed
>> my local copy,
>>>    and in the next build, it did take lot of time to clone it. But still the same
>> build error.
>>>
>>> I wonder why the same commit & topic branch is working for
>>> emenlow-noemgd BSP and does not working for emenlow? The only
>> relevant difference I see here is  SRCURI.
>>
>> What do you see if you head into the linux source build dir and run the same
>> commands that I tried below ?
>>
>> Bruce
>
> $ git show b170394a475b96ecc92cbc9e4b002bed0a9f69c5
> fatal: bad object b170394a475b96ecc92cbc9e4b002bed0a9f69c5
>
> $ git branch --contains b170394a475b96ecc92cbc9e4b002bed0a9f69c5
> error: no such commit b170394a475b96ecc92cbc9e4b002bed0a9f69c5
>
> # currently checkout out branch is standard/emenlow
>
> $ git log | grep "perf annotate: replace 'expand' with equivalent sed expression" -C 4 -n
> 30028-commit 2dbb9df035d1ebfb435cb200b262aa7570382877
> 30029-Author: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi at intel.com>
> 30030-Date:   Fri Oct 5 11:35:26 2012 -0500
> 30031-
> 30032:    perf annotate: replace 'expand' with equivalent sed expression
> 30033-
> 30034-    We don't have 'expand' in our userspace so we need to accomplish the
> 30035-    same thing using 'sed', which we do have.
> 30036-
>
>
> So the topic branch commit is present much deeper in the branch with different commit-id.
> May be merging of the emgd branch resulted it. Is it issue with the emgd branch rebased
> to an undesired point?

It shouldn't be. That commit shouldn't be present in the repository
at all (it isn't in mine). The emgd branches are off master, same
repo and can't bring in something like this.

So something is getting tied in a knot when the repository is fetched
into the source dir.

For your builds that work, do you have that commit present ?

Bruce

>
> Nitin
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> Nitin
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nitin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     > git show b170394a475b96ecc92cbc9e4b002bed0a9f69c5
>>>>>> commit b170394a475b96ecc92cbc9e4b002bed0a9f69c5
>>>>>> Author: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi at intel.com>
>>>>>> Date:   Fri Oct 5 11:35:26 2012 -0500
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         perf annotate: replace 'expand' with equivalent sed
>>>>>> expression
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         We don't have 'expand' in our userspace so we need to accomplish
>> the
>>>>>>         same thing using 'sed', which we do have.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi at intel.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>>>>>> b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c index 07aaeea..ff162ae 100644
>>>>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>>>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>>>>>> @@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ fallback:
>>>>>>             snprintf(command, sizeof(command),
>>>>>>                      "%s %s%s --start-address=0x%016" PRIx64
>>>>>>                      " --stop-address=0x%016" PRIx64
>>>>>> -                " -d %s %s -C %s|grep -v %s|expand",
>>>>>> +                " -d %s %s -C %s|grep -v %s|sed 's/\t/        /g'",
>>>>>>                      objdump_path ? objdump_path : "objdump",
>>>>>>                      disassembler_style ? "-M " : "",
>>>>>>                      disassembler_style ? disassembler_style : "",
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     > git branch --contains b170394a475b96ecc92cbc9e4b002bed0a9f69c5
>>>>>>       standard/arm-versatile-926ejs
>>>>>>       standard/base
>>>>>>       standard/beagleboard
>>>>>>       standard/ck
>>>>>>       standard/common-pc-64/base
>>>>>>       standard/common-pc-64/chiefriver
>>>>>>       standard/common-pc-64/crystalforest
>>>>>>       standard/common-pc-64/jasperforest
>>>>>>       standard/common-pc-64/rangeley
>>>>>>       standard/common-pc-64/romley
>>>>>>       standard/common-pc-64/sugarbay
>>>>>>       standard/common-pc/atom-pc
>>>>>>       standard/common-pc/base
>>>>>>       standard/crownbay
>>>>>>       standard/edf
>>>>>>       standard/emenlow
>>>>>>       standard/fri2
>>>>>>       standard/fsl-mpc8315e-rdb
>>>>>>       standard/mti-malta32
>>>>>>       standard/mti-malta64
>>>>>>       standard/preempt-rt/base
>>>>>>       standard/preempt-rt/fri2
>>>>>>       standard/preempt-rt/qemuppc
>>>>>>       standard/preempt-rt/routerstationpro
>>>>>>       standard/qemuppc
>>>>>>       standard/routerstationpro
>>>>>>       standard/sys940x
>>>>>>       standard/tiny/base
>>>>>>       standard/tiny/common-pc
>>>>>>       standard/tiny/fri2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whereas the tree you have locally doesn't have the commit at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am seeing this build error:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ERROR: Function failed: do_validate_branches (see
>>>>>>> /srv/home/nitin/build-test-bsps/build-
>> emenlow/tmp/work/emenlow-
>>>>>> poky-li
>>>>>>> nux/linux-
>>>>>> yocto/3.8+gitAUTOINC+c2ed0f16fdec628242a682897d5d86df4547cf2
>>>>>>> 4_b170394a475b96ecc9
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2cbc9e4b002bed0a9f69c5-r4.0/temp/log.do_validate_branches.3414
>> for
>>>>>>> further information)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in:
>>>>>>> /srv/home/nitin/build-test-bsps/build-
>> emenlow/tmp/work/emenlow-
>>>>>> poky-li
>>>>>>> nux/linux-
>>>>>> yocto/3.8+gitAUTOINC+c2ed0f16fdec628242a682897d5d86df4547cf2
>>>>>>> 4_b170394a475b96ecc92cbc9e4b002bed0a9f69c5-
>>>>>> r4.0/temp/log.do_validate_b
>>>>>>> ranches.3414
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Log data follows:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_validate_branches
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> | error: no such commit
>> b170394a475b96ecc92cbc9e4b002bed0a9f69c5
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is with the master branches of poky & oecore + v3.8 bbappends
>>>>>>> in the meta-intel layer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * poky.git :  master: commit
>>>>>>> 93ec7b4d1550e07caec86e2998d0f94a01c7e785
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * meta-intel.git :  master: commit
>>>>>>> 4ffe40409f8cd0f354a7488113ef888b42867033
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And this is my v3.8 bbappend in the meta-intel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> meta-emenlow/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.8.bbappend :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}:"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_emenlow = "emenlow"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> KMACHINE_emenlow = "emenlow"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> KBRANCH_emenlow = "standard/emenlow"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> KERNEL_FEATURES_emenlow_append = " features/drm-emgd/drm-
>>>> emgd-
>>>>>> 1.16
>>>>>>> cfg/vesafb"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_emenlow-noemgd = "emenlow-noemgd"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> KMACHINE_emenlow-noemgd = "emenlow"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> KBRANCH_emenlow-noemgd = "standard/emenlow"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> KERNEL_FEATURES_emenlow-noemgd_append = " features/drm-
>>>>>> gma500/drm-gma600"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SRCREV_meta_emenlow =
>>>> "c2ed0f16fdec628242a682897d5d86df4547cf24"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SRCREV_machine_emenlow =
>>>>>> "b170394a475b96ecc92cbc9e4b002bed0a9f69c5"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SRCREV_emgd_emenlow =
>>>>>> "caea08c988e0f41103bbe18eafca20348f95da02"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SRCREV_meta_emenlow-noemgd =
>>>>>> "c2ed0f16fdec628242a682897d5d86df4547cf24"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SRCREV_machine_emenlow-noemgd =
>>>>>> "b170394a475b96ecc92cbc9e4b002bed0a9f69c5"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SRC_URI_emenlow =
>>>>>>> "git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto-
>>>>>>
>> dev.git;protocol=git;nocheckout=1;branch=${KBRANCH},${KMETA},emgd-
>>>>>> 1.16;name=machine,meta,emgd"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All the commit IDs are valid on the v3.8 kernel repository. So I
>>>>>>> don't see any reason for the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> build error as seen above. I notice this issue is happening only
>>>>>>> for the BSPs which has emgd
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> branch in the SRC_URI. The same commit
>>>>>>> b170394a475b96ecc92cbc9e4b002bed0a9f69c5 giving
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> error is also used by the rest of the non emgd BSPs, and they
>>>>>>> don't see the error.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I think the kernel tools are probably making some mistake when
>>>>>>> emgd branch is specified in the SRC_URI.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let me know how you can help me out here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nitin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>




More information about the linux-yocto mailing list