[linux-yocto] [PATCH 0/2] [PATCH] valleyisland-io: add valley island io patches as feature under meta branch
bruce.ashfield at windriver.com
Mon Dec 2 22:06:13 PST 2013
On 12/2/2013, 9:09 PM, rebecca.swee.fun.chang at intel.com wrote:
> From: "Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun" <rebecca.swee.fun.chang at intel.com>
> This pull request is to add Valley Island I/O patches as features for
> Valley Island under meta branch.
We can do this, but exactly how is your BSP enabling the functionality ?
Is there any reason to not directly merge these to a BSP branch or to
standard/base, since they are upstream commits or x86 generic, they
should be fine for all BSPs ... right ?
My same question applies to the other recently submitted features.
> This pull request includes patch that fix EFI service mapping and patch
> for SPI controller support in ACPI mode.
> Please pull them into linux-yocto-3.8 meta branch.
> The following changes since commit 19e686b473ebf018c56c9eb839f5fbd88ecd9a5a:
> meta: add crystalforest bsp legacy block drivers configurations. (2013-10-28 09:15:50 -0400)
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto-contrib rebeccas/valleyisland-io-1
> Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun (2):
> valleyisland-io: add patch to fix EFI service mapping for valley
> valleyisland-io: add patch for Valley Island SPI controller support
> in ACPI mode
> ...d-support-for-SPI-controller-in-ACPI-mode.patch | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++
> .../0019-fix-32bit-efi-service-mapping.patch | 31 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/valleyisland-io/0018-spidev-add-support-for-SPI-controller-in-ACPI-mode.patch
> create mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/valleyisland-io/0019-fix-32bit-efi-service-mapping.patch
More information about the linux-yocto