[Automated-testing] syzkaller reproducers

Cyril Hrubis chrubis at suse.cz
Tue Oct 15 06:44:07 PDT 2019


Hi!
> >> I do not think that these scripts are ever supposed to be the used in
> >> production testing, you need much more than this to produce results
> >> reliably. I would expect that they are supposed to be a form of very
> >> minimal documentation.
> > Yes, I just added them as quick hints: some repros are 32-bits; each
> > needs a new dir; some external timeout is needed for each test.
> Thank you again for the collection of repro C programs!
> 
> Hitting a lot more crashes with the collection of repro C programs than 
> in all the hours of running Syzkaller. Wonder why? Any idea? This is 
> with the same kernel and VM that Syzkaller is run on.

I would guess that these reproducers are product of countless hours of
fuzzing, so it's about to be expected...

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis at suse.cz


More information about the automated-testing mailing list