[Automated-testing] syzkaller reproducers

Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google.com
Thu Oct 10 07:30:27 PDT 2019


On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:27 PM Cyril Hrubis <chrubis at suse.cz> wrote:
>
> Hi!
> > We discussed collecting and uploading all syzkaller reproducers
> > somewhere. You wanted to see how they look. I've uploaded all current
> > reproducers here:
> > https://github.com/dvyukov/syzkaller-repros
> > Minimalistic build/run scripts are included.
>
> What is the reason behind statically linking the reproducers?
>
> The difference between static and dynamic binary is a bit less than 4MB,
> which gives difference of several gigabytes for the whole repo. This
> amount of binary data would complicate and slow down any CI
> significantly...

Simply being able to run programs on a different machine. Dynamic
binaries generally don't run on a different linux machine. If you can
build dynamic binaries so that they run on test machine, feel free to
drop -static.


More information about the automated-testing mailing list