[Automated-testing] LAVA Intro presentation

William Mills wmills at ti.com
Thu Jan 30 08:08:13 PST 2014


So last Friday we suggested a follow up meeting this Friday.
(I apologize for trying to do this again on little notice.  I was 
travelling for meetings M-W)

I think this is worthwhile _if_:
Darren, Paul, Richard, Tyler, & Alan all attend.
We can do one of the following:
     * Articulate a starting use case or case(s)
     * Have concert follow up questions to the last meeting/video
     * Have input from LTSI about the problem they had

Do any of the following timeslots work (in preference order)
1) Friday Jan 31, 9 am   | noon   | 17:00 UK
2) Friday Jan 31, 10 am | 1pm    | 18:00 UK
3) Friday Jan 31, 8am    | 11 am | 16:00 UK

If a meeting does not happen tomorrow I suggest we start these topics
here in e-mail and then have a conf call later next week.

Bill


On 01/24/2014 03:59 PM, William Mills wrote:
> jinks.
>
>
> On 01/24/2014 03:57 PM, Alan Bennett wrote:
>> All;
>> For those that missed the event, you can find the recording @
>> http://youtu.be/ZpKRz9-SMGA
>>
>> The "raw" meeting notes can also be found in the Google document:
>> http://goo.gl/IZUtzY
>>
>> Alan
>>
>>
>> On 24 January 2014 12:50, Darren Hart <dvhart at linux.intel.com
>> <mailto:dvhart at linux.intel.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 20:52 +0100, Bird, Tim wrote:
>>     > Hi everyone,
>>     >
>>     > I'm really sorry I missed this event, as I was very interested
>>     in comparing LAVA to Cogent's
>>     > current systems (as I understand them), and to my own systems.
>>     >
>>
>>     Similarly for me as well. There were some workflow and integration
>>     concerns I wanted to discuss and how Lava compared to Autotest in this
>>     respect.
>>
>>     For example: what facilities exist in Lava for target management?
>>     Consoles? Logs? Power control? I use conmux for this with Autotest.
>>
>>     This unfortunately landed in the middle of some very heavy churn
>>     for me
>>     in a number of areas, and it would have been difficult to make the
>>     discussion even had I received the invite yesterday. Can we work
>>     to have
>>     a few days notice for things like this in the future?
>>
>>     I'm particularly disappointed to have missed it as I was the one that
>>     requested it.
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>
>>     Darren
>>
>>     > Were any answers provided to the questions below?  If so, could
>>     they be posted somewhere
>>     > for review?  I think we discussed setting up a page on the Yocto
>>     Project wiki about
>>     > this effort.  Has anyone done that yet?
>>     >
>>     > Thanks,
>>     >  -- Tim
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > On Friday, January 24, 2014 8:48 AM,
>>     automated-testing-bounces at yoctoproject.org
>>     <mailto:automated-testing-bounces at yoctoproject.org> On Behalf Of
>>     William Mills wrote:
>>     > >
>>     > > Here are my starter question.
>>     > > (Some of these I now know but I had these question a year ago
>>     when we
>>     > > started looking.)
>>     > >
>>     > > 1) Is LAVA suitable for personal machine deployments?
>>     > >
>>     > > I think the initial focus of this project should be a board lab
>>     > > environment.  This seems to be the natural environment of LAVA.
>>     > >
>>     > > That said, I think the Yocto Project recommended test tool
>>     should scale
>>     > > down to situations where a developer has a board attached to
>>     her PC
>>     > > where she does bitbake builds and then runs test locally.
>>     > >
>>     > > What issues do you see for LAVA in this situation?
>>     > >
>>     > > 2) We want to test images as produced by bitbake, can we do
>>     that with LAVA?
>>     > >
>>     > > For Ubuntu and other distros, LAVA uses a tool at test start
>>     to combine
>>     > > a generic image and a hw specific add on.  Bitbake already
>>     does this.
>>     > >
>>     > > Can we bypass this step and test the images just as they were
>>     produced
>>     > > from bitbake?  Do you already have examples of this working?
>>     > >
>>     > > 3) What types of image deployment / boot can you support?
>>     > >
>>     > > The traditional LAVA image deployment is to use multiple
>>     partitions on a
>>     > > boot storage device: a master image and a test image. I
>>     believe LAVA
>>     > > controls the boot process over a serial port to direct the
>>     boot flow to
>>     > > the master or test partition.
>>     > >
>>     > > What other scenarios do you support and do you have examples
>>     of these
>>     > > working already?
>>     > >
>>     > > * Network boot of kernel & standalone initramfs?
>>     > > * Network boot of kernel w/ NFS root?
>>     > > * SDMUX based boot from one of two SD cards based on
>>     dispatcher control?
>>     > > * BBB bootmode can be controlled via a Ethernet controlled
>>     relay board,
>>     > > can LAVA supoprt that?
>>     > > * others?
>>     > >
>>     > > 4) Yocto Project supports ARM, x86, MIPS, and PowerPC
>>     architectures.  Is
>>     > > that an issue for LAVA?
>>     > >
>>     > > We are starting with BeagleBoneBlack (ARMv7) and Minnow board
>>     (x86) but
>>     > > will eventually want to cover all the architectures.  YP test
>>     > > infrastructure users will want to add their own boards.
>>     > >
>>     > > How hard is this?
>>     > > Is LAVA flexibility enough to control various boards?
>>     > >
>>     > > 5) What is the size of the team that works on LAVA?  How many
>>     people are
>>     > > using outside of the linaro.org <http://linaro.org> LAB?
>>     > _______________________________________________
>>     > automated-testing mailing list
>>     > automated-testing at yoctoproject.org
>>     <mailto:automated-testing at yoctoproject.org>
>>     > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/automated-testing
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Alan Bennett, Engineering Manager, Linaro LAVA Team
>> Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/>***│ *Open source software for ARM
>> SoCs | Follow Linaro*:*Facebook
>> <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> | Twitter
>> <http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg> | Blog
>> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/>
>> irc: akbennett | alan.bennett at linaro.org
>> <mailto:alan.bennett at linaro.org> | linaro-validation at lists.linaro.org
>> <mailto:linaro-validation at lists.linaro.org>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> automated-testing mailing list
> automated-testing at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/automated-testing
>


More information about the automated-testing mailing list